Radeon R9 285 / 380 vs Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Radeon R9 285 / 380
Popular choices:
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | Xe LPG (2023) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $199 for the Radeon R9 285 / 380, it costs 50% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 97.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+97.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 285 / 380 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
Radeon R9 285 / 380
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 2 2014. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 918 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 190W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,550 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in December 14 2023. It features the Xe LPG architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1950 MHz. It has 4 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 scores 5,550 and the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 285 / 380 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) uses Xe LPG, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 4 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,550 | 5,500 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Xe LPG |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+44700% | 4 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB | 768 KB+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) has 4 GB. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs System.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 176 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 12 Ultimate (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs Xe Media Engine (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Decoder: UVD 5.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | UVD 5.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 draws 190W versus the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)'s 15W — a 170.7% difference. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 350W (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 221mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 190W | 15W-92% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 350W-30% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 221mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 29.2 | 366.7+1156% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 285 / 380 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) costs 49.7% less ($99 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 27.9 (Radeon R9 285 / 380) vs 55.0 (Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)) — the Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) offers 97.1% better value. The Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 285 / 380 | Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-34% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | $100-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 27.9 | 55.0+97% |
| Codename | Tonga | Meteor Lake iGPU |
| Release | September 2 2014 | December 14 2023 |
| Ranking | #365 | #496 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 285 / 380 and Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arrow Lake)
