Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) uses modern memory architecture. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.9% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (6 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Turing (2018−2022) / 12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1350 MHz to 1485 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,119 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X scores 9,741 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) reaches 10,119 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1,024 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 3.041 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1485 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,741 | 10,119+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+300% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+183% | 3.041 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1485 MHz+41% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+300% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — a 77.8% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+78% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+2033% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+100% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC 6th Gen |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X draws 275W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)'s 50W — a 138.5% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 50W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 195mm | — |
| Height | 115mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-13% | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 35.4 | 202.4+472% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | — |
| Codename | Fiji | TU116 |
| Release | June 24 2015 | April 23 2020 |
| Ranking | #282 | #324 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Mobile)
