CPU
GPU
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 11 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1035 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,080 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X scores 9,741 and the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile reaches 10,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 5.299 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1035 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,741 | 10,080+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+60% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+62% | 5.299 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz+1% | 1035 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 256+220% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 2.5 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile) — a 166.7% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+167% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X draws 275W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile's 75W — a 114.3% difference. The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 195mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 75W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 195mm | 0mm |
| Height | 115mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-19% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.4 | 134.4+280% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80 | — |
| Codename | Fiji | GA106 |
| Release | June 24 2015 | May 11 2021 |
| Ranking | #282 | #262 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X and GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile
