
Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
Popular choices:

Radeon 8040S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 8040S
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 8040S is significantly newer (2025 vs 2015). The Radeon 8040S likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 8040S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (4 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $80 versus $400 for the Radeon 8040S, it costs 80% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 399.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+399.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($80) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X and Radeon 8040S

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon 8040S
The Radeon 8040S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2800 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,756 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X scores 9,741 and the Radeon 8040S reaches 9,756 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon 8040S uses RDNA 3.5, both on 28 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1,024 (Radeon 8040S). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 5.734 TFLOPS (Radeon 8040S). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 2800 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,741 | 9,756 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+300% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+50% | 5.734 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 2800 MHz+167% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+300% | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 4096-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 8 MB (Radeon 8040S) — the Radeon 8040S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | System |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 12.2 (Radeon 8040S). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6+5% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8040S). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8040S).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X draws 275W versus the Radeon 8040S's 55W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 8040S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 500W (Radeon 8040S). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 195mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 55W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 195mm | 0mm |
| Height | 115mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-24% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 35.4 | 177.4+401% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the Radeon 8040S launched at $400 and now averages $400. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X costs 80% less ($320 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 121.8 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 24.4 (Radeon 8040S) — the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X offers 399.2% better value. The Radeon 8040S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X | Radeon 8040S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $400-38% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $80-80% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 121.8+399% | 24.4 |
| Codename | Fiji | Strix Halo |
| Release | June 24 2015 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #282 | #265 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













