Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X
VS
GeForce GTX 970

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X vs GeForce GTX 970

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

2015Boost: 1050 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970

2014Core: 1050 MHzBoost: 1178 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 970.

InsightRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XGeForce GTX 970
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
Standard Size (267mm)

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 970 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 970 holds the technical lead. Priced at $50 (vs $80), it costs 38% less, resulting in a 58.3% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XGeForce GTX 970
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+58.3%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($80)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X and GeForce GTX 970

AMD

Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,741 points. Launch price was $649.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 970

The GeForce GTX 970 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 19 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1050 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 1664 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,640 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X scores 9,741 and the GeForce GTX 970 reaches 9,640 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 970 uses Maxwell 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 1,664 (GeForce GTX 970). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 3.92 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1178 MHz.

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XGeForce GTX 970
G3D Mark Score
9,741+1%
9,640
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Maxwell 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
4096+146%
1664
Compute (TFLOPS)
8.602 TFLOPS+119%
3.92 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1178 MHz+12%
ROPs
64+14%
56
TMUs
256+146%
104
L1 Cache
1 MB+64%
0.61 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XGeForce GTX 970
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce GTX 970) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X. Bus width: 4096-bit vs 256-bit.

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XGeForce GTX 970
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
HBM
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s+129%
224 GB/s
Bus Width
4096-bit+1500%
256-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 12 (FL 12_1) (GeForce GTX 970). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XGeForce GTX 970
DirectX
12.0
12 (FL 12_1)
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.4
4.6+5%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs NVENC 2nd gen (GeForce GTX 970). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs PureVideo VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce GTX 970).

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XGeForce GTX 970
Encoder
VCE 3.0
NVENC 2nd gen
Decoder
UVD 6.0
PureVideo VP6
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265/HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X draws 275W versus the GeForce GTX 970's 150W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 970 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 970). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 195mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XGeForce GTX 970
TDP
275W
150W-45%
Recommended PSU
600W
500W-17%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
2x 6-pin
Length
195mm
267mm
Height
115mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
65°C-19%
80°C
Perf/Watt
35.4
64.3+82%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X launched at $649 MSRP and currently averages $80, while the GeForce GTX 970 launched at $329 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 970 costs 37.5% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 121.8 (Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X) vs 192.8 (GeForce GTX 970) — the GeForce GTX 970 offers 58.3% better value. The Radeon R9 Fury + Fury X is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2014).

FeatureRadeon R9 Fury + Fury XGeForce GTX 970
MSRP
$649
$329-49%
Avg Price (30d)
$80
$50-38%
Performance per Dollar
121.8
192.8+58%
Codename
Fiji
GM204
Release
June 24 2015
September 19 2014
Ranking
#282
#269