
Radeon R9 Fury X

Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon R9 Fury X vs Radeon RX 5500 XT Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon R9 Fury X vs Radeon RX 5500 XT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon R9 Fury X vs Radeon RX 5500 XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon R9 Fury X
2015Why buy it
- ✅6.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 4 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌2015 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌226.1% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.5 vs 45.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5500 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 215.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.6 vs 14.5 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 4 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 Fury X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R9 Fury X vs Radeon RX 5500 XT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 Fury X
The Radeon R9 Fury X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 24 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 275W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,382 points. Launch price was $649.

Radeon RX 5500 XT
The Radeon RX 5500 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 12 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1845 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 9,080 points. Launch price was $169.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 Fury X scores 9,382 and the Radeon RX 5500 XT reaches 9,080 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 Fury X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Raw compute: 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 5.196 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Boost clocks: 1050 MHz vs 1845 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 9,382+3% | 9,080 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+191% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.602 TFLOPS+66% | 5.196 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | 1845 MHz+76% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 256+191% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 5500 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 Fury X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 Fury X has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5500 XT carries 8 GB. Radeon RX 5500 XT gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500 XT) — a 128.6% advantage for the Radeon R9 Fury X. Memory bus width is 4096-bit on the Radeon R9 Fury X and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 5500 XT.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | HBM | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+129% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 4096-bit+3100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500 XT).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 Fury X draws 275W versus the Radeon RX 5500 XT's 130W — a 71.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5500 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 450W (Radeon RX 5500 XT). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 195mm vs 180mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 60°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 275W | 130W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 450W-25% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 195mm | 180mm |
| Height | 115mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 60°C-20% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 34.1 | 69.8+105% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon R9 Fury X came in at $649, while the Radeon RX 5500 XT launched at $199. On MSRP, Radeon RX 5500 XT was 69.3% cheaper ($450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 14.5 (Radeon R9 Fury X) vs 45.6 (Radeon RX 5500 XT) — the Radeon RX 5500 XT offers 214.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 5500 XT (2019 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon R9 Fury X | Radeon RX 5500 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $199-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 14.5 | 45.6+214% |
| Codename | Fiji | Navi 14 |
| Release | June 24 2015 | December 12 2019 |
| Ranking | #282 | #291 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















