Radeon R9 M275X / M375 vs GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is positioned at rank #469 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M275X / M375
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is significantly newer (2023 vs 2014). The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1338.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R9 M275X / M375.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1338.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1338.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $380 (vs $300), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 1035.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon R9 M275X / M375.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1035.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($300) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($380) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M275X / M375 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
Radeon R9 M275X / M375
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 28 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,575 points.
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 18 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2535 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,651 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon R9 M275X / M375 scores 1,575 versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 22,651 — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti leads by 1338.2%. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 28 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 4,352 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Raw compute: 1.184 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 22.06 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Boost clocks: 925 MHz vs 2535 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,575 | 22,651+1338% |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 4352+580% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.184 TFLOPS | 22.06 TFLOPS+1763% |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | 2535 MHz+174% |
| ROPs | 16 | 48+200% |
| TMUs | 40 | 136+240% |
| L1 Cache | 0.16 MB | 4.3 MB+2587% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 32 MB+12700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 32 MB (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 32 MB+12700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 draws 75W versus the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti's 160W — a 72.3% difference. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 550W (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti). Power connectors: Mobile vs 8-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 240mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W-53% | 160W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-36% | 550W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | 8-pin |
| Length | 1mm | 240mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 21.0 | 141.6+574% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 launched at $300 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $380. The Radeon R9 M275X / M375 costs 21.1% less ($80 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.3 (Radeon R9 M275X / M375) vs 59.6 (GeForce RTX 4060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers 1024.5% better value. The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M275X / M375 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $300-25% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300-21% | $380 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.3 | 59.6+1025% |
| Codename | Venus | AD106 |
| Release | January 28 2014 | May 18 2023 |
| Ranking | #746 | #59 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R9 M275X / M375 and GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
