
Radeon R9 M485X vs Radeon RX 560

Radeon R9 M485X
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 560
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon R9 M485X is positioned at rank #393 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R9 M485X
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R9 M485X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon RX 560 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M485X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX 560 holds the technical lead. Priced at $60 (vs $150), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 142.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R9 M485X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+142.2%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) | ✅More affordable ($60) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R9 M485X and Radeon RX 560

Radeon R9 M485X
The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R9 M485X scores 3,801 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M485X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,801+3% | 3,682 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+100% | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.961 TFLOPS+13% | 2.611 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+100% | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R9 M485X comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 560 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (12_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | UVD 6.0 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R9 M485X draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70 C.
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 75W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W-22% | 450W |
| Power Connector | Mobile | None |
| Length | — | 170mm |
| Height | — | 112mm |
| Slots | — | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 70 C-13% |
| Perf/Watt | 15.2 | 49.1+223% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R9 M485X launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99 and now averages $60. The Radeon RX 560 costs 60% less ($90 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.3 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 61.4 (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 142.7% better value. The Radeon RX 560 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon R9 M485X | Radeon RX 560 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450 | $99-78% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150 | $60-60% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.3 | 61.4+143% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Polaris 21 |
| Release | May 15 2016 | April 18 2017 |
| Ranking | #519 | #527 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















