G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon R9 M485X vs Radeon RX 560 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon R9 M485X vs Radeon RX 560: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon R9 M485X

2016

Why buy it

✅30.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
❌2016 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
354.5% HIGHER MSRP
$450 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 8.4 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).

Radeon RX 560

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Delivers 340.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 8.4 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Radeon R9 M485X is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon RX 560 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R9 M485X across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R9 M485X is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 30.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 3.2% in PassMark G3D (3,801 vs 3,682), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 560 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 4 GB vs 2 GB of VRAM, native frame generation with FSR Frame Generation (2023), while Radeon R9 M485X has no comparable frame-generation support, a 14nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2017 generation instead of 2016. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX 560 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $351 cheaper on MSRP at $99 vs $450, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 340.3% (37.2 vs 8.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R9 M485X still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon R9 M485X vs Radeon RX 560 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon R9 M485X

The Radeon R9 M485X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 723 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,801 points.

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R9 M485X scores 3,801 and the Radeon RX 560 reaches 3,682 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R9 M485X is built on GCN 3.0 while the Radeon RX 560 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 1,024 (Radeon RX 560). Raw compute: 2.961 TFLOPS (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560).

Feature	Radeon R9 M485X	Radeon RX 560
G3D Mark Score	3,801+3%	3,682
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	28 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+100%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.961 TFLOPS+13%	2.611 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon R9 M485X does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

Feature	Radeon R9 M485X	Radeon RX 560
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R9 M485X has 2 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 560 carries 4 GB. Radeon RX 560 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon R9 M485X and 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 1 MB (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon R9 M485X	Radeon RX 560
VRAM Capacity	2 GB	4 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 12 (12_0) (Radeon RX 560). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon R9 M485X	Radeon RX 560
DirectX	12	12 (12_0)
Vulkan	1.2	1.3+8%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+33%	3

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon RX 560). Decoder: UVD 6.0 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4 (Radeon RX 560).

Feature	Radeon R9 M485X	Radeon RX 560
Encoder	VCE 3.0	VCE 3.4
Decoder	UVD 6.0	UVD 6.3
Codecs	H.264,HEVC,VP9	HEVC,H.264,VP9,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R9 M485X draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 560's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon RX 560 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 450W (Radeon RX 560). Power connectors: Mobile vs None. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70 C.

Feature	Radeon R9 M485X	Radeon RX 560
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	Mobile	None
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	70 C-13%
Perf/Watt	15.2	49.1+223%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon R9 M485X came in at $450, while the Radeon RX 560 launched at $99. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560 was 78% cheaper ($351 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 8.4 (Radeon R9 M485X) vs 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 342.9% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 560 (2017 vs 2016).

Feature	Radeon R9 M485X	Radeon RX 560
MSRP	$450	$99-78%
Performance per Dollar	8.4	37.2+343%
Codename	Amethyst	Polaris 21
Release	May 15 2016	April 18 2017
Ranking	#519	#527

Search Radeon R9 M485X on Amazon

Search Radeon RX 560 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.