Radeon RX 5300M
VS
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Radeon RX 5300M vs Quadro T1000 Max-Q

AMD

Radeon RX 5300M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1445 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

2019Core: 765 MHzBoost: 1350 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon RX 5300M is positioned at rank 41 and the Quadro T1000 Max-Q is on rank 17, so the Quadro T1000 Max-Q offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5300M

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
92%
#31
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
172%
#33
156%
#34
156%
#38
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
142%
#39
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
141%
#41
Radeon RX 5300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#46
Radeon RX 5500M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100
94%
#48
GeForce GTX 980 (móvel)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150
93%
#49
GeForce 610M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $20
93%
#50
GeForce GTX 1650 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $75
92%
#53
GeForce GTX 980M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $80
90%
#54
GeForce GTX 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1000 Max-Q

#2
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
236%
#17
Quadro T1000 Max-Q
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
71%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
64%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro T1000 Max-Q offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon RX 5300MQuadro T1000 Max-Q
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.9%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%)
Longevity
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+33.3%)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5300M and Quadro T1000 Max-Q

AMD

Radeon RX 5300M

The Radeon RX 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1445 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,044 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro T1000 Max-Q

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 765 MHz to 1350 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,000 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 5300M scores 5,044 and the Quadro T1000 Max-Q reaches 5,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5300M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro T1000 Max-Q uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 896 (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Raw compute: 4.069 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 2.419 TFLOPS (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Boost clocks: 1445 MHz vs 1350 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 5300MQuadro T1000 Max-Q
G3D Mark Score
5,044
5,000
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Turing
Process Node
7 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1408+57%
896
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.069 TFLOPS+68%
2.419 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1445 MHz+7%
1350 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
88+57%
56
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 5300MQuadro T1000 Max-Q
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 5300M comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro T1000 Max-Q has 4 GB. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 96-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1000 Max-Q) — the Radeon RX 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 5300MQuadro T1000 Max-Q
VRAM Capacity
3 GB
4 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Bus Width
96-bit+50%
64-bit
L2 Cache
1.5 MB+50%
1 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 5300M draws 85W versus the Quadro T1000 Max-Q's 50W — a 51.9% difference. The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon RX 5300M) vs 350W (Quadro T1000 Max-Q). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon RX 5300MQuadro T1000 Max-Q
TDP
85W
50W-41%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
59.3
100.0+69%