
Radeon RX 550X
Popular choices:

GeForce MX330
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX330
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 550X is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce MX330.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550X | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | Pascal (2016−2021) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 550X offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $100 for the GeForce MX330, it costs 55% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 125.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 550X | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+125.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($45) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 550X and GeForce MX330

Radeon RX 550X
The Radeon RX 550X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 16 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,381 points.

GeForce MX330
The GeForce MX330 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1531 MHz to 1594 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 10W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,350 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 550X scores 2,381 and the GeForce MX330 reaches 2,350 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 550X is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce MX330 uses Pascal, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 512 (Radeon RX 550X) vs 384 (GeForce MX330). Raw compute: 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 550X) vs 1.224 TFLOPS (GeForce MX330). Boost clocks: 1183 MHz vs 1594 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 2,381+1% | 2,350 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.211 TFLOPS | 1.224 TFLOPS+1% |
| Boost Clock | 1183 MHz | 1594 MHz+35% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 144 KB+13% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 550X comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce MX330 has 2 GB. The Radeon RX 550X offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | 48 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon RX 550X) vs 12 (GeForce MX330). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: UVD (Radeon RX 550X) vs Pascal (GeForce MX330). Decoder: VCE vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 550X) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (GeForce MX330).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | UVD | Pascal |
| Decoder | VCE | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 550X draws 50W versus the GeForce MX330's 10W — a 133.3% difference. The GeForce MX330 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 550X) vs 350W (GeForce MX330). Power connectors: None vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W | 10W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | Mobile |
| Length | 145mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 47.6 | 235.0+394% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 550X launched at $109 MSRP and currently averages $45, while the GeForce MX330 launched at $150 and now averages $100. The Radeon RX 550X costs 55% less ($55 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 52.9 (Radeon RX 550X) vs 23.5 (GeForce MX330) — the Radeon RX 550X offers 125.1% better value. The GeForce MX330 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 550X | GeForce MX330 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $109-27% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $45-55% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 52.9+125% | 23.5 |
| Codename | Lexa | GP108 |
| Release | December 16 2018 | February 10 2020 |
| Ranking | #642 | #647 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














