Radeon RX 560
T400
Radeon RX 560 vs T400 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 560 vs T400 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Radeon RX 560 vs T400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 560
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $81 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.2 vs 20.1 G3D/$ ($99 MSRP vs $180 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌150% higher power demand at 75W vs 30W.
T400
2021Why buy it
- ✅Radeon RX 560 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so T400 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 75W, a 45W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌81.8% HIGHER MSRP$180 MSRPvs$99 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 20.1 vs 37.2 G3D/$ ($180 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 560 vs T400 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon RX 560
The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.
T400
The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 560 scores 3,682 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 1425 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,682+2% | 3,609 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+167% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.611 TFLOPS+139% | 1.094 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1275 MHz | 1425 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+167% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 384 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 560 is support for FSR Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The T400 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Radeon RX 560 and 64-bit on the T400.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 560 draws 75W versus the T400's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 560) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 75W | 30W-60% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 350W-22% |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 49.1 | 120.3+145% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 560 came in at $99, while the T400 launched at $180. On MSRP, Radeon RX 560 was 45% cheaper ($81 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 37.2 (Radeon RX 560) vs 20.1 (T400) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 85.1% better value. The newer card here is T400 (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX 560 | T400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-45% | $180 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.2+85% | 20.1 |
| Codename | Polaris 21 | TU117 |
| Release | April 18 2017 | May 6 2021 |
| Ranking | #527 | #532 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 560 and T400
