Radeon RX 560 vs T400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar T400

#38

Radeon PRO W6600X

MSRP: $699|Avg: $699

94%

#41

Quadro RTX 3000 (móvel)

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

90%

#42

Radeon Pro W5700

MSRP: $799|Avg: $300

90%

#43

Radeon Pro W5700X

MSRP: $999|Avg: $999

88%

#44

RTX A4000

MSRP: $1111|Avg: $1111

87%

#45

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

MSRP: $849|Avg: $748

84%

#46

Quadro RTX 4000

MSRP: $899|Avg: $220

83%

#65

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

737%

#80

T400

MSRP: $180|Avg: $179

100%

#86

Quadro P3200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $63

86%

#89

Quadro P2000

MSRP: $425|Avg: $190

82%

#90

Quadro T1000

MSRP: $400|Avg: $425

81%

#93

Radeon Pro 580

MSRP: $500|Avg: $150

77%

#94

T1000 8GB

MSRP: $500|Avg: $380

77%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The T400 uses modern memory architecture. The T400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX 560 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 560 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the T400.

Insight	Radeon RX 560	T400
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 560 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $179 for the T400, it costs 66% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 204.4% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon RX 560	T400
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+204.4%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($60)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($179)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 560 Benchmark Check

T400 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 560 and T400

Radeon RX 560

The Radeon RX 560 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1175 MHz to 1275 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,682 points. Launch price was $99.

T400

The T400 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in May 6 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 420 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,609 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 560 scores 3,682 and the T400 reaches 3,609 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 560 is built on GCN 4.0 while the T400 uses Turing, both on 14 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon RX 560) vs 384 (T400). Raw compute: 2.611 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 560) vs 1.094 TFLOPS (T400). Boost clocks: 1275 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	T400
G3D Mark Score	3,682+2%	3,609
Architecture	GCN 4.0	Turing
Process Node	14 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1024+167%	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.611 TFLOPS+139%	1.094 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1275 MHz	1425 MHz+12%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	64+167%	24
L1 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX 560	T400
Upscaling Tech	FSR 2.1	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 (Compatible)	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR5. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	T400
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	256-bit+300%	64-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 560 draws 75W versus the T400's 30W — a 85.7% difference. The T400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 560) vs 350W (T400). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon RX 560	T400
TDP	75W	30W-60%
Recommended PSU	450W	350W-22%
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	170mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	70 C	—
Perf/Watt	49.1	120.3+145%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 560 launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the T400 launched at $180 and now averages $179. The Radeon RX 560 costs 66.5% less ($119 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 61.4 (Radeon RX 560) vs 20.2 (T400) — the Radeon RX 560 offers 204% better value. The T400 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).