
Radeon RX 5700M vs GeForce GTX 980M SLI

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 980M SLI
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5700M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 980M SLI
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5700M is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The Radeon RX 5700M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 980M SLI lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 980M SLI.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700M and GeForce GTX 980M SLI

Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.

GeForce GTX 980M SLI
The GeForce GTX 980M SLI is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1038 MHz to 1127 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,523 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700M scores 12,669 and the GeForce GTX 980M SLI reaches 12,523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 980M SLI uses Maxwell, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 3,072 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 1127 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,669+1% | 12,523 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3072+33% |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz+53% | 1127 MHz |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 160 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980M SLI) — a 140% advantage for the Radeon RX 5700M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s+140% | 160 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980M SLI). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs NVENC 4.0 (2x) (GeForce GTX 980M SLI). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980M SLI).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC 4.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700M draws 180W versus the GeForce GTX 980M SLI's 200W — a 10.5% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 980M SLI). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce GTX 980M SLI |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-10% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.4+12% | 62.6 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















