Radeon RX 5700M
VS
RTX A3000 Mobile

Radeon RX 5700M vs RTX A3000 Mobile

AMD

Radeon RX 5700M

2020Core: 1465 MHzBoost: 1720 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A3000 Mobile

2021Core: 600 MHzBoost: 1230 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5700M

#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
100%
#17
Radeon RX 5700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
89%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RTX A3000 Mobile

#12
RTX A3000 Mobile
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#16
Radeon RX 7600S
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
182%
#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
161%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RTX A3000 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5700M.

InsightRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%)
Leading raw performance (+0.4%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm)
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the RTX A3000 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700M and RTX A3000 Mobile

AMD

Radeon RX 5700M

The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.

NVIDIA

RTX A3000 Mobile

The RTX A3000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 600 MHz to 1230 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,720 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 5700M scores 12,669 and the RTX A3000 Mobile reaches 12,720 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A3000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 4,096 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Raw compute: 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 10.08 TFLOPS (RTX A3000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 1230 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
G3D Mark Score
12,669
12,720
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Ampere
Process Node
7 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
2304
4096+78%
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.926 TFLOPS
10.08 TFLOPS+27%
Boost Clock
1720 MHz+40%
1230 MHz
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
144+13%
128
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
Upscaling Tech
FSR 2.1
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 4 MB (RTX A3000 Mobile) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
8 MB+100%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 12.2 (RTX A3000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.2
1.3+8%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A3000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A3000 Mobile).

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
Encoder
VCN 2.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VCN 2.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 5700M draws 180W versus the RTX A3000 Mobile's 70W — a 88% difference. The RTX A3000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 500W (RTX A3000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 5700MRTX A3000 Mobile
TDP
180W
70W-61%
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
80°C-6%
Perf/Watt
70.4
181.7+158%