
Radeon RX 5700M vs Radeon Pro WX 8200

Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 8200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5700M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 8200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro WX 8200.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700M | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700M and Radeon Pro WX 8200

Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.

Radeon Pro WX 8200
The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 13 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1200 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,615 points. Launch price was $999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700M scores 12,669 and the Radeon Pro WX 8200 reaches 12,615 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon Pro WX 8200 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Raw compute: 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 10.75 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,669 | 12,615 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3584+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.926 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS+36% |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz+15% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 224+56% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro WX 8200) — the Radeon RX 5700M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro WX 8200).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700M draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro WX 8200's 230W — a 24.4% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 500W (Radeon Pro WX 8200). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-22% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.4+28% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700M is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $350 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | March 1 2020 | August 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #751 | #210 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















