Radeon RX 5700M vs Arc A750
Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
Arc A750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5700M
Performance Per Dollar Arc A750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5700M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Arc A750.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (268mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 5700M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700M and Arc A750
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
Arc A750
The Arc A750 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in October 12 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2050 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,600 points. Launch price was $289.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 5700M scores 12,669 and the Arc A750 reaches 12,600 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 5700M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Arc A750 uses Generation 12.7, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 3,584 (Arc A750). Raw compute: 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (Arc A750). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,669 | 12,600 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3584+56% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.926 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+117% |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz | 2400 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 64 | 112+75% |
| TMUs | 144 | 224+56% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 16 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A750) — a 33.3% advantage for the Arc A750. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 16 MB (Arc A750) — the Arc A750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 512 GB/s+33% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 16 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 12 Ultimate (Arc A750). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs Dual Xe Media Engine (Arc A750). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Arc A750).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | Dual Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700M draws 180W versus the Arc A750's 225W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 650W (Arc A750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin + 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 268mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 78°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-20% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin + 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 268mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 78°C-8% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.4+26% | 56.0 |
Value Analysis
The Arc A750 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $289 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $229 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | DG2-512 |
| Release | March 1 2020 | October 12 2022 |
| Ranking | #751 | #212 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5700M and Arc A750
