Radeon RX 5700M vs GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon RX 5700M
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5700M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 149.3% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 5700M.
| Insight | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-149.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+149.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) / 7nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 4nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (285mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 5700M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Radeon RX 5700M
The Radeon RX 5700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,669 points.
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 2310 MHz to 2610 MHz. It has 7680 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 285W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31,578 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 5700M scores 12,669 versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 31,578 — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti leads by 149.3%. The Radeon RX 5700M is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 7,680 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Raw compute: 7.926 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 40.09 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Boost clocks: 1720 MHz vs 2610 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,669 | 31,578+149% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 7680+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.926 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS+406% |
| Boost Clock | 1720 MHz | 2610 MHz+52% |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240+67% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 48 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX 5700M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 5700M comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 384 GB/s (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 48 MB (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384 GB/s | 504 GB/s+31% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB | 48 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs NVENC (8th Gen) (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC (5th Gen). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700M) vs AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | NVENC (8th Gen) |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | NVDEC (5th Gen) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | AV1,H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 5700M draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti's 285W — a 45.2% difference. The Radeon RX 5700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon RX 5700M) vs 700W (GeForce RTX 4070 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 285mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-37% | 285W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-29% | 700W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 285mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.4 | 110.8+57% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2020).
| Feature | Radeon RX 5700M | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $590 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | AD104 |
| Release | March 1 2020 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #751 | #11 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 5700M and GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
