Radeon RX 6300 vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 6300 is positioned at rank #14 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300

#6

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

122%

#8

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

111%

#9

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

111%

#13

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

101%

#14

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

100%

#18

Radeon RX 560X (móvel)

MSRP: $55|Avg: $55

98%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 47.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300.

Insight	Radeon RX 6300	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-47.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+47.9%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX 6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $75 for the GeForce GTX 1650, it costs 47% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 26.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon RX 6300	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+26.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($40)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX 6300 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300 and GeForce GTX 1650

Radeon RX 6300

The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 47.9%. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	5,319	7,869+48%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Turing
Process Node	6 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	768	896+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.686 TFLOPS+24%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2400 MHz+44%	1665 MHz
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	48	56+17%
L1 Cache	256 KB	896 KB+250%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1650 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 3 (Native)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) vs 128 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1650) — a 100% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1650. Bus width: 32-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	64 GB/s	128 GB/s+100%
Bus Width	32-bit	128-bit+300%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1650). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300	GeForce GTX 1650
DirectX	12_2	12
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs NVENC 5th gen (Volta) (GeForce GTX 1650). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs NVDEC 4th gen.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300	GeForce GTX 1650
Encoder	VCN 3.0	NVENC 5th gen (Volta)
Decoder	VCN 3.0	NVDEC 4th gen
Codecs	—	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 160mm vs 229mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon RX 6300	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	35W-53%	75W
Recommended PSU	300W	300W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	None
Length	160mm	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	152.0+45%	104.9

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 46.7% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 26.8% better value. The Radeon RX 6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).