Radeon RX 6300 vs GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Radeon RX 6300
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX 6300 is positioned at rank #14 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Excellent cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 6300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 123.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 6300.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-123.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+123.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 6300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $150 for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM, it costs 73% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 67.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+67.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 6300 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Radeon RX 6300
The Radeon RX 6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,319 points.
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1515 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,892 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 6300 scores 5,319 versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 11,892 — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM leads by 123.6%. The Radeon RX 6300 is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 768 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Raw compute: 3.686 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6300) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Boost clocks: 2400 MHz vs 1755 MHz. Ray tracing: 12 RT cores (Radeon RX 6300) vs 20 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) vs 80.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,319 | 11,892+124% |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 768 | 2560+233% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.686 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+144% |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz+37% | 1755 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 48 | 80+67% |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2.5 MB+900% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 12 | 20+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6300 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 6300 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3050 OEM offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 64 GB/s (Radeon RX 6300) vs 224 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — a 250% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM. Bus width: 32-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX 6300) vs 2 MB (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 8 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 224 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 32-bit | 128-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_2 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_2 | 12.2+2% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 6300 draws 35W versus the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM's 130W — a 115.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (Radeon RX 6300) vs 450W (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 160mm vs 235mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 35W-73% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-33% | 450W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 8-pin |
| Length | 160mm | 235mm |
| Height | — | 124mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 152.0+66% | 91.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6300 launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GeForce RTX 3050 OEM launched at $249 and now averages $150. The Radeon RX 6300 costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 133.0 (Radeon RX 6300) vs 79.3 (GeForce RTX 3050 OEM) — the Radeon RX 6300 offers 67.7% better value.
| Feature | Radeon RX 6300 | GeForce RTX 3050 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-76% | $249 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-73% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 133.0+68% | 79.3 |
| Codename | Navi 24 | GA106 |
| Release | January 4 2022 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #379 | #224 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 6300 and GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
