Radeon RX 7400 vs Arc A770M
Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Arc A770M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7400.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7400 | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A770M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7400 and Arc A770M
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Arc A770M
The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7400 scores 11,654 and the Arc A770M reaches 11,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7400 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Arc A770M uses Generation 12.7, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 4,096 (Arc A770M). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400) vs 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 2050 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 7400) vs 32 (Arc A770M) vs 512.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,654 | 11,853+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 4096+129% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS | 16.79 TFLOPS+2% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+12% | 2050 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 112 | 256+129% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 32+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A770M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7400 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Arc A770M has 16 GB. The Arc A770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) vs 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) — a 300% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) vs 16 MB (Arc A770M) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 512 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 16 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 12.2 (Arc A770M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400) vs Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs Xe Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | Xe Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7400 draws 43W versus the Arc A770M's 120W — a 94.5% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 7400) vs 500W (Arc A770M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-64% | 120W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 271.0+174% | 98.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Arc A770M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199 | — |
| Codename | Navi 33 | DG2-512 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | 2022 |
| Ranking | #229 | #225 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7400 and Arc A770M
