
Radeon RX 7400 vs Quadro M6000 24GB

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:

Quadro M6000 24GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400
Performance Per Dollar Quadro M6000 24GB
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7400 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2016). The Radeon RX 7400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro M6000 24GB lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro M6000 24GB offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ✅ More VRAM (+200%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $199 versus $600 for the Quadro M6000 24GB, it costs 67% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 202.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+202.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($199) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7400 and Quadro M6000 24GB

Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

Quadro M6000 24GB
The Quadro M6000 24GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 5 2016. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 988 MHz to 1114 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,625 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7400 scores 11,654 and the Quadro M6000 24GB reaches 11,625 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7400 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro M6000 24GB uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 3,072 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400) vs 6.844 TFLOPS (Quadro M6000 24GB). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1114 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,654 | 11,625 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 3072+71% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+141% | 6.844 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+106% | 1114 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 256+129% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1.1 MB+120% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro M6000 24GB lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7400 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro M6000 24GB has 24 GB. The Quadro M6000 24GB offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) vs 317 GB/s (Quadro M6000 24GB) — a 147.7% advantage for the Quadro M6000 24GB. Bus width: 64-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) vs 3 MB (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Quadro M6000 24GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 24 GB+200% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 317 GB/s+148% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 384-bit+500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 12/1 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12/1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400) vs NVENC 4.0 (Quadro M6000 24GB). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro M6000 24GB).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7400 draws 43W versus the Quadro M6000 24GB's 250W — a 141.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 7400) vs 500W (Quadro M6000 24GB). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-83% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 271.0+483% | 46.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Quadro M6000 24GB launched at $4999 and now averages $600. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 66.8% less ($401 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 19.4 (Quadro M6000 24GB) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 202.1% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro M6000 24GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-96% | $4999 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199-67% | $600 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.6+202% | 19.4 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GM200 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | March 5 2016 |
| Ranking | #229 | #233 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















