Radeon RX 7400
VS
GeForce GTX 1660

Radeon RX 7400 vs GeForce GTX 1660

AMD

Radeon RX 7400

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

2019Core: 1530 MHzBoost: 1785 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400

#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
108%
#17
Radeon RX 6700
MSRP: $379|Avg: $300
108%
#18
Radeon RX 6600 XT
MSRP: $379|Avg: $170
106%
#19
Radeon RX590 GME
MSRP: $173|Avg: $115
105%
#20
Radeon RX 6650 XT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $230
105%
#21
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
103%
#22
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
MSRP: $169|Avg: $179
103%
#23
GeForce RTX 3050 8GB
MSRP: $249|Avg: $209
102%
#24
Radeon RX 6600 LE
MSRP: $329|Avg: $160
102%
#25
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB
MSRP: $379|Avg: $379
102%
#26
Radeon RX 7700 XT
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
102%
#27
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $380
102%
#28
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 10GB
MSRP: $269|Avg: $318
101%
#29
Radeon RX 6700 XT
MSRP: $479|Avg: $230
101%
#30
GeForce RTX 3060
MSRP: $329|Avg: $289
100%
#31
Radeon RX 7400
MSRP: $199|Avg: $199
100%
#32
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
100%
#33
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
98%
#34
Radeon RX 5300
MSRP: $129|Avg: $50
96%
#35
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
MSRP: $150|Avg: $77
95%
#36
Radeon RX 6400
MSRP: $159|Avg: $139
95%
#37
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
MSRP: $599|Avg: $330
95%
#38
Arc A750
MSRP: $289|Avg: $229
94%
#39
Radeon RX 6800
MSRP: $579|Avg: $370
93%
#40
GeForce RTX 3060 8GB
MSRP: $329|Avg: $280
93%
#41
Radeon RX 6750 XT
MSRP: $549|Avg: $320
92%
#42
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
MSRP: $799|Avg: $590
91%
#43
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB
MSRP: $429|Avg: $429
91%
#44
GeForce RTX 5070
MSRP: $549|Avg: $550
90%
#45
Radeon RX 7600 XT
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
89%
#46
GeForce RTX 2050
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon RX 7400 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2019). The Radeon RX 7400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon RX 7400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660.

InsightRadeon RX 7400GeForce GTX 1660
Performance
Leading raw performance (+0.1%)
Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%)
Longevity
🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm)
Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem
✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
🎮 High Capacity (6 GB)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1660 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $180 versus $199 for the Radeon RX 7400, it costs 10% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 10.4% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon RX 7400GeForce GTX 1660
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+10.4%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($199)
More affordable ($180)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7400 and GeForce GTX 1660

AMD

Radeon RX 7400

The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 1660

The GeForce GTX 1660 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 14 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,639 points. Launch price was $219.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX 7400 scores 11,654 and the GeForce GTX 1660 reaches 11,639 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7400 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the GeForce GTX 1660 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400) vs 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1785 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX 7400GeForce GTX 1660
G3D Mark Score
11,654
11,639
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Turing
Process Node
6 nm
12 nm
Shading Units
1792+27%
1408
Compute (TFLOPS)
16.49 TFLOPS+228%
5.027 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2300 MHz+29%
1785 MHz
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
112+27%
88
L1 Cache
0.5 MB
1.4 MB+180%
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

FeatureRadeon RX 7400GeForce GTX 1660
Upscaling Tech
FSR 3 (Native)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX 7400 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 has 6 GB. The Radeon RX 7400 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660) — a 50% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660) — the Radeon RX 7400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX 7400GeForce GTX 1660
VRAM Capacity
8 GB+33%
6 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
192 GB/s+50%
Bus Width
64-bit
192-bit+200%
L2 Cache
2 MB+33%
1.5 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1660). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX 7400GeForce GTX 1660
DirectX
12.2
12.1
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660).

FeatureRadeon RX 7400GeForce GTX 1660
Encoder
VCN 4.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
VCN 4.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX 7400 draws 43W versus the GeForce GTX 1660's 120W — a 94.5% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 7400) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660). Power connectors: None vs 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon RX 7400GeForce GTX 1660
TDP
43W-64%
120W
Recommended PSU
450W
450W
Power Connector
None
8-pin
Length
241mm
229mm
Height
111mm
111mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
75°C
75°C
Perf/Watt
271.0+179%
97.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the GeForce GTX 1660 launched at $219 and now averages $180. The GeForce GTX 1660 costs 9.5% less ($19 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 64.7 (GeForce GTX 1660) — the GeForce GTX 1660 offers 10.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).

FeatureRadeon RX 7400GeForce GTX 1660
MSRP
$199-9%
$219
Avg Price (30d)
$199
$180-10%
Performance per Dollar
58.6
64.7+10%
Codename
Navi 33
TU116
Release
August 8 2025
March 14 2019
Ranking
#229
#231