
Radeon RX 7400 vs Quadro P5200

Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:

Quadro P5200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400
Performance Per Dollar Quadro P5200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 7400 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2018). The Radeon RX 7400 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro P5200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (8 GB vs 4 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro P5200.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $199 versus $240 for the Quadro P5200, it costs 17% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 20.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($199) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($240) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7400 and Quadro P5200

Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.

Quadro P5200
The Quadro P5200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 21 2018. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1556 MHz to 1746 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,650 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7400 scores 11,654 and the Quadro P5200 reaches 11,650 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7400 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Quadro P5200 uses Pascal, both on 6 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 2,560 (Quadro P5200). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400) vs 8.94 TFLOPS (Quadro P5200). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1746 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,654 | 11,650 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 2560+43% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+84% | 8.94 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+32% | 1746 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 112 | 160+43% |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 960 KB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Quadro P5200 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7400 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5200 has 4 GB. The Radeon RX 7400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 256-bit+300% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5200). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400) vs NVENC 5.0 (Quadro P5200). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs PureVideo HD VP7. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P5200).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC 5.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | PureVideo HD VP7 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7400 draws 43W versus the Quadro P5200's 100W — a 79.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 7400) vs 500W (Quadro P5200). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-57% | 100W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 271.0+133% | 116.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the Quadro P5200 launched at $500 and now averages $240. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 17.1% less ($41 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 48.5 (Quadro P5200) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 20.8% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | Quadro P5200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-60% | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199-17% | $240 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.6+21% | 48.5 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GP104 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | February 21 2018 |
| Ranking | #229 | #230 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















