Radeon RX 7400 vs RTX A4000H
Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
RTX A4000H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400
Performance Per Dollar RTX A4000H
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX A4000H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7400.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $199 versus $927 for the RTX A4000H, it costs 79% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 359.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+359.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($199) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($927) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7400 and RTX A4000H
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7400 scores 11,654 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7400 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 7400) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,654 | 11,815+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 6144+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+47% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 48+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX A4000H lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 250% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Bus width: 64-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7400 draws 43W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 106% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 7400) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-69% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 271.0+221% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $199, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000 and now averages $927. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 78.5% less ($728 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 12.7 (RTX A4000H) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 361.4% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-80% | $1000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $199-79% | $927 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.6+361% | 12.7 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA104 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #229 | #226 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7400 and RTX A4000H
