Radeon RX 7400
RTX A4000H
Radeon RX 7400 vs RTX A4000H Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX 7400 vs RTX A4000H FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX 7400 vs RTX A4000H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX 7400
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $801 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 395.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 58.6 vs 11.8 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 140W, a 97W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000H across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
RTX A4000H
2021Why buy it
- ✅18.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Radeon RX 7400 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌402.5% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.8 vs 58.6 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
- ❌225.6% higher power demand at 140W vs 43W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 7400 vs RTX A4000H Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
RTX A4000H
The RTX A4000H is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 6144 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 140W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 48 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,815 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7400 scores 11,654 and the RTX A4000H reaches 11,815 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7400 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the RTX A4000H uses Ampere, both on 6 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 6,144 (RTX A4000H). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400) vs 19.17 TFLOPS (RTX A4000H). Boost clocks: 2300 MHz vs 1560 MHz. Ray tracing: 28 RT cores (Radeon RX 7400) vs 48 (RTX A4000H) vs 192.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,654 | 11,815+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792 | 6144+243% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS+16% |
| Boost Clock | 2300 MHz+47% | 1560 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 112 | 192+71% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 6 MB+1100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 28 | 48+71% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX A4000H does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX A4000H gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 7400 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) vs 448 GB/s (RTX A4000H) — a 250% advantage for the RTX A4000H. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon RX 7400 and 192-bit on the RTX A4000H. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) vs 4 MB (RTX A4000H) — the RTX A4000H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 448 GB/s+250% |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 192-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000H). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400) vs None (RTX A4000H). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400) vs None (RTX A4000H).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | None |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7400 draws 43W versus the RTX A4000H's 140W — a 106% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (Radeon RX 7400) vs 500W (RTX A4000H). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-69% | 140W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 271.0+221% | 84.4 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX 7400 came in at $199, while the RTX A4000H launched at $1000. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7400 was 80.1% cheaper ($801 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) vs 11.8 (RTX A4000H) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 396.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7400 (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7400 | RTX A4000H |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-80% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.6+397% | 11.8 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GA104 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #229 | #226 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX 7400 and RTX A4000H
