Radeon PRO V710 vs Radeon RX 7400
Radeon PRO V710
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO V710
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon PRO V710 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7400.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 5nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX 7400 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $199 versus $2,000 for the Radeon PRO V710, it costs 90% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 876% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+876%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($2,000) | ✅More affordable ($199) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon PRO V710 and Radeon RX 7400
Radeon PRO V710
The Radeon PRO V710 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 3 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1900 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 3456 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 158W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 54 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,000 points.
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon PRO V710 scores 12,000 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon PRO V710 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 5 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,456 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 27.65 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO V710) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 2000 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 54 RT cores (Radeon PRO V710) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,000+3% | 11,654 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3456+93% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 27.65 TFLOPS+68% | 16.49 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2000 MHz | 2300 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 216+93% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 54+93% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon PRO V710 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO V710) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon PRO V710 draws 158W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 114.4% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon PRO V710) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 267mm vs 241mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 158W | 43W-73% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 267mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 75.9 | 271.0+257% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon PRO V710 launched at $2000 MSRP and currently averages $2000, while the Radeon RX 7400 launched at $199 and now averages $199. The Radeon RX 7400 costs 90% less ($1801 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.0 (Radeon PRO V710) vs 58.6 (Radeon RX 7400) — the Radeon RX 7400 offers 876.7% better value. The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2024).
| Feature | Radeon PRO V710 | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $199-90% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $2000 | $199-90% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 58.6+877% |
| Codename | Navi 32 | Navi 33 |
| Release | October 3 2024 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #196 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon PRO V710 and Radeon RX 7400
