Arc A770M vs Radeon RX 7400
Arc A770M
Popular choices:
Radeon RX 7400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Arc A770M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Arc A770M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (16 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX 7400.
| Insight | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🔮Strong Longevity (Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) / 6nm) | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) / 6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (16 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Arc A770M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Arc A770M and Radeon RX 7400
Arc A770M
The Arc A770M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1650 MHz to 2050 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,853 points.
Radeon RX 7400
The Radeon RX 7400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 11,654 points.
Graphics Performance
The Arc A770M scores 11,853 and the Radeon RX 7400 reaches 11,654 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Arc A770M is built on Generation 12.7 while the Radeon RX 7400 uses RDNA 3.0, both on a 6 nm process. Shader units: 4,096 (Arc A770M) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7400). Raw compute: 16.79 TFLOPS (Arc A770M) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7400). Boost clocks: 2050 MHz vs 2300 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Arc A770M) vs 28 (Radeon RX 7400) with 512 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 11,853+2% | 11,654 |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+129% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.79 TFLOPS+2% | 16.49 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2050 MHz | 2300 MHz+12% |
| ROPs | 128+100% | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+129% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 6 MB+1100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32+14% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7400 is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Arc A770M lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | XeSS | FSR 3 (Native) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Arc A770M comes with 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7400 has 8 GB. The Arc A770M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 512 GB/s (Arc A770M) vs 128 GB/s (Radeon RX 7400) — a 300% advantage for the Arc A770M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 16 MB (Arc A770M) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7400) — the Arc A770M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s+300% | 128 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+300% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 16 MB+700% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Arc A770M) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7400). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Xe Media Engine (Arc A770M) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7400). Decoder: Xe Media Engine vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (Arc A770M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7400).
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | Xe Media Engine | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Arc A770M draws 120W versus the Radeon RX 7400's 43W — a 94.5% difference. The Radeon RX 7400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Arc A770M) vs 450W (Radeon RX 7400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 241mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W | 43W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 450W-10% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 241mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 98.8 | 271.0+174% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7400 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2022).
| Feature | Arc A770M | Radeon RX 7400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $199 |
| Codename | DG2-512 | Navi 33 |
| Release | 2022 | August 8 2025 |
| Ranking | #225 | #229 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Arc A770M and Radeon RX 7400
