
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs GeForce RTX 4070

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 4070
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce RTX 4070 is significantly newer (2023 vs 2017). The GeForce RTX 4070 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 4070 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 93% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 64.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-93%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+93%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (304mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega 64 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $85 versus $550 for the GeForce RTX 4070, it costs 85% less. While it maintains lower overall performance, this results in a 235.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+235.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($85) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($550) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 64 and GeForce RTX 4070

Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

GeForce RTX 4070
The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 13,949 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 93%. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 2475 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,949 | 26,919+93% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 5888+44% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.66 TFLOPS | 29.15 TFLOPS+130% |
| Boost Clock | 1546 MHz | 2475 MHz+60% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+39% | 184 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 5.8 MB+480% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 3.5 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.0 (Native) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega 64 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 4.1% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 2048-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 484 GB/s | 504 GB/s+4% |
| Bus Width | 2048-bit+967% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 36 MB+800% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 8th Gen NVENC (2x) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 64 draws 295W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 38.4% difference. The GeForce RTX 4070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 200W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 650W-13% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 304mm |
| Height | 111mm | 137mm |
| Slots | 2-33% | 3 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 134.6+185% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599 and now averages $550. The Radeon RX Vega 64 costs 84.5% less ($465 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 164.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 48.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 235.6% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | GeForce RTX 4070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-17% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $85-85% | $550 |
| Performance per Dollar | 164.1+236% | 48.9 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | AD104 |
| Release | August 7 2017 | April 12 2023 |
| Ranking | #171 | #32 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















