G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RadeonT RX 6850M XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RadeonT RX 6850M XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
✅Delivers 99.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌78.8% higher power demand at 295W vs 165W.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

2022

Why buy it

✅17.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 165W instead of 295W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
100.4% HIGHER MSRP
$1,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.6% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.3% in PassMark G3D (13,992 vs 13,949), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 12 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM, a 7nm process instead of 14nm, 40 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon RX Vega 64 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $501 cheaper on MSRP at $499 vs $1,000, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 99.8% (28.0 vs 14.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Radeon RX Vega 64 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, RadeonT RX 6850M XT has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RadeonT RX 6850M XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon RX Vega 64

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 13,949 and the RadeonT RX 6850M XT reaches 13,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 2581 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
G3D Mark Score	13,949	13,992
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4096+60%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.66 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS+4%
Boost Clock	1546 MHz	2581 MHz+67%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	256+60%	160
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling + RSR

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega 64 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT carries 12 GB. RadeonT RX 6850M XT gives you 50% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 64 and 128-bit on the RadeonT RX 6850M XT. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	HBM2	GDDR6
Bus Width	2048-bit+1500%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Encoder	VCE 4.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 7.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega 64 draws 295W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 56.5% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
TDP	295W	165W-44%
Recommended PSU	750W	500W-33%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	85°C
Perf/Watt	47.3	84.8+79%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon RX Vega 64 came in at $499, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 64 was 50.1% cheaper ($501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is RadeonT RX 6850M XT (2022 vs 2017).

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP	$499-50%	$1000
Performance per Dollar	28.0+100%	14.0
Codename	Vega 10	Navi 22
Release	August 7 2017	January 4 2022
Ranking	#171	#103

Search Radeon RX Vega 64 on Amazon

Search RadeonT RX 6850M XT on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.