Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RadeonT RX 6850M XT

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar RadeonT RX 6850M XT

#52

Radeon 8060S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

161%

#53

Radeon RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

155%

#54

Radeon RX 6800S

MSRP: $800|Avg: $800

142%

#61

GeForce RTX 2070 (móvel)

MSRP: $800|Avg: $350

110%

#62

GeForce RTX 2080 (móvel)

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $350

107%

#63

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

MSRP: $1000|Avg: $600

100%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses modern memory architecture. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (12 GB vs 8 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega 64.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020))	🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) / 7nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	🎮 High Capacity (12 GB)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	Standard Size (267mm)	—

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon RX Vega 64 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $85 versus $600 for the RadeonT RX 6850M XT, it costs 86% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 603.7% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+603.7%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($85)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($600)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon RX Vega 64 Benchmark Check

RadeonT RX 6850M XT Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 64 and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

Radeon RX Vega 64

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT

The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 13,949 and the RadeonT RX 6850M XT reaches 13,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 2581 MHz.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
G3D Mark Score	13,949	13,992
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	4096+60%	2560
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.66 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS+4%
Boost Clock	1546 MHz	2581 MHz+67%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	256+60%	160
L1 Cache	1 MB+100%	0.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the RadeonT RX 6850M XT is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 3 (Native)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon RX Vega 64 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has 12 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 2048-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	12 GB+50%
Memory Type	HBM2	GDDR6
Bus Width	2048-bit+1500%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+33%	3 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4+300%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Encoder	VCE 4.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	UVD 7.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega 64 draws 295W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 56.5% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
TDP	295W	165W-44%
Recommended PSU	750W	500W-33%
Power Connector	2x 8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	85°C
Perf/Watt	47.3	84.8+79%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000 and now averages $600. The Radeon RX Vega 64 costs 85.8% less ($515 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 164.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 23.3 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 604.3% better value. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2017).

Feature	Radeon RX Vega 64	RadeonT RX 6850M XT
MSRP	$499-50%	$1000
Avg Price (30d)	$85-86%	$600
Performance per Dollar	164.1+604%	23.3
Codename	Vega 10	Navi 22
Release	August 7 2017	January 4 2022
Ranking	#171	#103