Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RTX A2000 12GB

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017Core: 1247 MHzBoost: 1546 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

RTX A2000 12GB

2021Core: 562 MHzBoost: 1200 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RTX A2000 12GB Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RTX A2000 12GB FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RTX A2000 12GB: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

  • 15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 11.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $499 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
  • 321.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 70W.
  • 59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.

RTX A2000 12GB

2021

Why buy it

  • Costs $50 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 70W instead of 295W, a 225W reduction.
  • Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX Vega 64 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (13,949 vs 13,721), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
RTX A2000 12GB is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 14nm, 26 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RTX A2000 12GB makes the most sense to buy today. It is $50 cheaper on MSRP at $449 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 9.3% (30.6 vs 28.0), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon RX Vega 64 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RTX A2000 12GB Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon RX Vega 64

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

NVIDIA

RTX A2000 12GB

The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 13,949 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 1200 MHz.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 64RTX A2000 12GB
G3D Mark Score
13,949+2%
13,721
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Ampere
Process Node
14 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
4096+23%
3328
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.66 TFLOPS+59%
7.987 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1546 MHz+29%
1200 MHz
ROPs
64+33%
48
TMUs
256+146%
104
L1 Cache
1 MB
3.3 MB+230%
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX A2000 12GB gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega 64 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 64RTX A2000 12GB
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 64 and 128-bit on the RTX A2000 12GB. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 64RTX A2000 12GB
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
HBM2
GDDR6
Bus Width
2048-bit+1500%
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+33%
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 64RTX A2000 12GB
DirectX
12.1
12.2
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 64RTX A2000 12GB
Encoder
VCE 4.0
7th Gen NVENC
Decoder
UVD 7.0
5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode)
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon RX Vega 64 draws 295W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 123.3% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 64RTX A2000 12GB
TDP
295W
70W-76%
Recommended PSU
750W
500W-33%
Power Connector
2x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
167mm
Height
111mm
68mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
75°C-12%
Perf/Watt
47.3
196.0+314%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon RX Vega 64 came in at $499, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. On MSRP, RTX A2000 12GB was 10% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the RTX A2000 12GB offers 9.3% better value. The newer card here is RTX A2000 12GB (2021 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon RX Vega 64RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP
$499
$449-10%
Performance per Dollar
28.0
30.6+9%
Codename
Vega 10
GA106
Release
August 7 2017
November 23 2021
Ranking
#171
#177

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.