Radeon RX Vega 64
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $350 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 65.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 16.9 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌321.4% higher power demand at 295W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
2025Why buy it
- ✅20.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 295W, a 225W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌70.1% HIGHER MSRP$849 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.9 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($849 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 13,949 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 1957 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,949 | 14,363+3% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096 | 4352+6% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.66 TFLOPS | 17.03 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1546 MHz | 1957 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 256+88% | 136 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 4.3 MB+330% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX Vega 64 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega 64 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell carries 16 GB. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 2048-bit on the Radeon RX Vega 64 and 256-bit on the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 2048-bit+700% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 32 MB+700% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | 9th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | 6th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 64 draws 295W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 123.3% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 70W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 111mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 70°C-18% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 205.2+334% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon RX Vega 64 came in at $499, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. On MSRP, Radeon RX Vega 64 was 41.2% cheaper ($350 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 65.7% better value. The newer card here is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-41% | $849 |
| Performance per Dollar | 28.0+66% | 16.9 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GB206 |
| Release | August 7 2017 | August 11 2025 |
| Ranking | #171 | #165 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX Vega 64 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
