
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Intel Arc Pro B60

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro B60
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The Intel Arc Pro B60 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Intel Arc Pro B60.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Xe2 (2024) / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega 64 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $85 versus $450 for the Intel Arc Pro B60, it costs 81% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 434.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+434.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($85) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 64 and Intel Arc Pro B60

Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 13,949 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,949+1% | 13,807 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+60% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.66 TFLOPS+3% | 12.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1546 MHz | 2400 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 256+60% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 2048-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 2048-bit+1500% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 64 draws 295W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W — a 38.4% difference. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 82.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 200W-32% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 82-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 69.0+46% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500 and now averages $450. The Radeon RX Vega 64 costs 81.1% less ($365 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 164.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 30.7 (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 434.5% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $85-81% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 164.1+435% | 30.7 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | August 7 2017 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #171 | #175 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















