
Radeon RX Vega 64 vs Quadro GP100

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro GP100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro GP100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon RX Vega 64 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon RX Vega 64 holds the technical lead. Priced at $85 (vs $1,335), it costs 94% less, resulting in a 1498% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+1498%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($85) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($1,335) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega 64 and Quadro GP100

Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX Vega 64 scores 13,949 and the Quadro GP100 reaches 13,710 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is built on GCN 5.0 while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 14 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1546 MHz vs 1442 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,949+2% | 13,710 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 4096+14% | 3584 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.66 TFLOPS+22% | 10.34 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1546 MHz+7% | 1442 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 256+14% | 224 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.3 MB+30% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega 64 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 484 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 111.6% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 2048-bit vs 4096-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 484 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+112% |
| Bus Width | 2048-bit | 4096-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: UVD 7.0 vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 4.0 | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | UVD 7.0 | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega 64 draws 295W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 22.6% difference. The Quadro GP100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 2x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 295W | 235W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 750W | 500W-33% |
| Power Connector | 2x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 47.3 | 58.3+23% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $85, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000 and now averages $1335. The Radeon RX Vega 64 costs 93.6% less ($1250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 164.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64) vs 10.3 (Quadro GP100) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 1493.2% better value. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega 64 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-93% | $7000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $85-94% | $1335 |
| Performance per Dollar | 164.1+1493% | 10.3 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | GP100 |
| Release | August 7 2017 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #171 | #178 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















