Radeon RX Vega M GL vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Radeon RX Vega M GL
Popular choices:
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is positioned at rank #208 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX Vega M GL
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 420% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (8 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon RX Vega M GL.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-420%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+420%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $150), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 178.6% better value per dollar than the Radeon RX Vega M GL.
| Insight | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+178.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($150) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Radeon RX Vega M GL
The Radeon RX Vega M GL is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 1 2018. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 931 MHz to 1011 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,906 points.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX Vega M GL scores 3,906 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 420%. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 14 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 2.588 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1011 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,906 | 20,312+420% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280 | 4864+280% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.588 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+526% |
| Boost Clock | 1011 MHz | 1665 MHz+65% |
| ROPs | 32 | 80+150% |
| TMUs | 80 | 152+90% |
| L1 Cache | 0.31 MB | 4.8 MB+1448% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX Vega M GL comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 179.2 GB/s (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 150% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 1024-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | 448 GB/s+150% |
| Bus Width | 1024-bit+300% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.3+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 3.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: UVD 6.3 vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 3.0 | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | UVD 6.3 | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX Vega M GL draws 65W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 101.9% difference. The Radeon RX Vega M GL is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: Integrated vs 8-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 242mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80 vs 75.
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 65W-68% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 600W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | 8-pin |
| Length | 0mm | 242mm |
| Height | 0mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80 | 75-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 60.1 | 101.6+69% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX Vega M GL launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $150, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399 and now averages $280. The Radeon RX Vega M GL costs 46.4% less ($130 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 26.0 (Radeon RX Vega M GL) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 178.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX Vega M GL | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $150-62% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-46% | $280 |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.0 | 72.5+179% |
| Codename | Polaris 22 | GA104 |
| Release | February 1 2018 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #500 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon RX Vega M GL and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
