Radeon TM vs GeForce GTX 970M
Radeon TM
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 970M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon TM is positioned at rank 55 and the GeForce GTX 970M is on rank 27, so the GeForce GTX 970M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 970M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon TM is significantly newer (2024 vs 2014). The Radeon TM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 970M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 970M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon TM offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon TM | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 970M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon TM and GeForce GTX 970M
Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.
GeForce GTX 970M
The GeForce GTX 970M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 7 2014. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 924 MHz to 1038 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 81W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,705 points. Launch price was $2,560.89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon TM scores 5,564 and the GeForce GTX 970M reaches 5,705 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon TM is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce GTX 970M uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon TM) vs 1,280 (GeForce GTX 970M). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM) vs 2.657 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 970M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1038 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon TM | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,564 | 5,705+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1280+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+124% | 2.657 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+179% | 1038 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 64 | 80+25% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 480 KB+88% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon TM | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon TM comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 970M has 3 GB. The Radeon TM offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon TM) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 970M) — the Radeon TM has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon TM | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+33% | 3 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon TM draws 15W versus the GeForce GTX 970M's 81W — a 137.5% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon TM) vs 350W (GeForce GTX 970M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon TM | GeForce GTX 970M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-81% | 81W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 370.9+427% | 70.4 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon TM and GeForce GTX 970M
