
Radeon TM vs Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Radeon TM
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon TM is positioned at rank 55 and the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is on rank 123, so the Radeon TM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon TM is significantly newer (2024 vs 2011). The Radeon TM likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon TM.
| Insight | Radeon TM | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Terascale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon TM and Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire

Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
The Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2011. It features the Terascale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,637 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon TM scores 5,564 and the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire reaches 5,637 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon TM is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire uses Terascale 2, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon TM) vs 1,920 (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire).
| Feature | Radeon TM | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,564 | 5,637+1% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Terascale 2 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1920+88% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon TM | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit x2.
| Feature | Radeon TM | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit x2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon TM draws 15W versus the Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon TM) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | Radeon TM | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 370.9+229% | 112.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon TM | Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $150 |
| Codename | Strix Point | Blackcomb XT |
| Release | July 15 2024 | January 6 2011 |
| Ranking | #312 | #537 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















