Radeon TM
VS
Radeon Pro 5300M

Radeon TM vs Radeon Pro 5300M

AMD

Radeon TM

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1250 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon TM is positioned at rank 55 and the Radeon Pro 5300M is on rank 18, so the Radeon Pro 5300M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
92%
#45
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
195%
#47
177%
#48
176%
#52
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
160%
#53
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
159%
#55
Radeon TM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#62
Radeon 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
96%
#65
95%
#66
94%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro 5300M

#3
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
252%
#18
Radeon Pro 5300M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#26
RTX A400
MSRP: $135|Avg: $135
76%
#29
Radeon Pro 5500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
68%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
63%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon Pro 5300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon TM.

InsightRadeon TMRadeon Pro 5300M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.2%)
Leading raw performance (+5.2%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)
RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro 5300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon TM and Radeon Pro 5300M

AMD

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon TM scores 5,564 versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 5,853 — the Radeon Pro 5300M leads by 5.2%. The Radeon TM is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon TM) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

FeatureRadeon TMRadeon Pro 5300M
G3D Mark Score
5,564
5,853+5%
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
RDNA 1.0
Process Node
4 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
1024
1280+25%
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS+86%
3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+132%
1250 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
80+25%
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon TMRadeon Pro 5300M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon TMRadeon Pro 5300M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon TM draws 15W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 140% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon TM) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon TMRadeon Pro 5300M
TDP
15W-82%
85W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
370.9+438%
68.9