Radeon TM
VS
Intel Arc Pro A30M

Radeon TM vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

AMD

Radeon TM

2024Core: 400 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
VS
Intel

Intel Arc Pro A30M

2022Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2000 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon TM is positioned at rank 55 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M is on rank 30, so the Intel Arc Pro A30M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM

#19
Radeon RX 5600
MSRP: $229|Avg: $150
92%
#45
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
195%
#47
177%
#48
176%
#52
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
160%
#53
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
159%
#55
Radeon TM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#58
GeForce 770M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
97%
#62
Radeon 820M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $25
96%
#65
95%
#66
94%
#68
GeForce GTX 850M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A30M

#9
Intel Arc Pro B50
MSRP: $349|Avg: $349
90%
#11
Quadro RTX 4000 (móvel)
MSRP: $900|Avg: $300
85%
#15
Tesla K20m
MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55
378%
#16
Radeon PRO W7500
MSRP: $429|Avg: $401
79%
#18
Radeon Pro V520 MxGPU
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $340
78%
#19
RTX A2000 12GB
MSRP: $449|Avg: $380
78%
#20
Radeon Pro Vega 56
MSRP: $399|Avg: $60
78%
#21
RTX A2000
MSRP: $450|Avg: $320
77%
#30
Intel Arc Pro A30M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#33
Radeon PRO W6400
MSRP: $229|Avg: $200
94%
#36
T600
MSRP: $200|Avg: $180
82%
#43
P106-100
MSRP: $224|Avg: $30
76%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon TM.

InsightRadeon TMIntel Arc Pro A30M
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-5.4%)
Leading raw performance (+5.4%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)
Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Arc Pro A30M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon TM and Intel Arc Pro A30M

AMD

Radeon TM

The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro A30M

The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon TM scores 5,564 versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 5,862 — the Intel Arc Pro A30M leads by 5.4%. The Radeon TM is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon TM) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon TM) vs 8 (Intel Arc Pro A30M).

FeatureRadeon TMIntel Arc Pro A30M
G3D Mark Score
5,564
5,862+5%
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Generation 12.7
Process Node
4 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
1024
1024
Compute (TFLOPS)
5.939 TFLOPS+45%
4.096 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
2900 MHz+45%
2000 MHz
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
64
64
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
Ray Tracing Cores
16+100%
8

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon TMIntel Arc Pro A30M
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
XeSS
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon TM) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon TMIntel Arc Pro A30M
VRAM Capacity
4 GB
4 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
Shared
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon TM draws 15W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon TM) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon TMIntel Arc Pro A30M
TDP
15W-70%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt
370.9+216%
117.2