
Radeon TM vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

Radeon TM
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro A30M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon TM is positioned at rank 55 and the Intel Arc Pro A30M is on rank 30, so the Intel Arc Pro A30M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM
Performance Per Dollar Intel Arc Pro A30M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon TM.
| Insight | Radeon TM | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel Arc Pro A30M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon TM and Intel Arc Pro A30M

Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

Intel Arc Pro A30M
The Intel Arc Pro A30M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in August 8 2022. It features the Generation 12.7 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 8 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,862 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon TM scores 5,564 versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 5,862 — the Intel Arc Pro A30M leads by 5.4%. The Radeon TM is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Intel Arc Pro A30M uses Generation 12.7, both on 4 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon TM) vs 1,024 (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon TM) vs 8 (Intel Arc Pro A30M).
| Feature | Radeon TM | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,564 | 5,862+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Generation 12.7 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1024 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+45% | 4.096 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+45% | 2000 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16+100% | 8 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon TM | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | XeSS |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs System. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon TM) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro A30M) — the Intel Arc Pro A30M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon TM | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon TM draws 15W versus the Intel Arc Pro A30M's 50W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon TM) vs 350W (Intel Arc Pro A30M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon TM | Intel Arc Pro A30M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-70% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 370.9+216% | 117.2 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















