
Radeon TM vs GeForce MX570

Radeon TM
Popular choices:

GeForce MX570
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon TM is positioned at rank 55 and the GeForce MX570 is on rank 117, so the Radeon TM offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon TM
Performance Per Dollar GeForce MX570
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce MX570 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon TM.
| Insight | Radeon TM | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce MX570 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon TM and GeForce MX570

Radeon TM
The Radeon TM is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 15 2024. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 400 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,564 points.

GeForce MX570
The GeForce MX570 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,738 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon TM scores 5,564 and the GeForce MX570 reaches 5,738 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon TM is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce MX570 uses Ampere, both on 4 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon TM) vs 2,048 (GeForce MX570). Raw compute: 5.939 TFLOPS (Radeon TM) vs 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce MX570). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1155 MHz. Ray tracing: 16 RT cores (Radeon TM) vs 16 (GeForce MX570) vs 64.
| Feature | Radeon TM | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,564 | 5,738+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.939 TFLOPS+26% | 4.731 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+151% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 40+25% |
| TMUs | 64 | 64 |
| L1 Cache | 0.25 MB | 2 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon TM | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon TM | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon TM draws 15W versus the GeForce MX570's 25W — a 50% difference. The Radeon TM is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon TM) vs 350W (GeForce MX570). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon TM | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-40% | 25W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Perf/Watt | 370.9+62% | 229.5 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon TM is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2022).
| Feature | Radeon TM | GeForce MX570 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | Strix Point | GA107 |
| Release | July 15 2024 | Maio 2022 |
| Ranking | #312 | #407 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















