Radeon X1300 vs GeForce G 103M
Radeon X1300
Popular choices:
GeForce G 103M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1300 is positioned at rank 345 and the GeForce G 103M is on rank 252, so the GeForce G 103M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1300
Performance Per Dollar GeForce G 103M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon X1300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce G 103M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce G 103M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1300.
| Insight | Radeon X1300 | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce G 103M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1300 and GeForce G 103M
Radeon X1300
The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
GeForce G 103M
The GeForce G 103M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 63 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1300 scores 58 versus the GeForce G 103M's 63 — the GeForce G 103M leads by 8.6%. The Radeon X1300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce G 103M uses Pascal, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon X1300) vs 384 (GeForce G 103M). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce G 103M). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 58 | 63+9% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+267% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+311% | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+12% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+267% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1300 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce G 103M has 512 MB. The GeForce G 103M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce G 103M) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0c (Radeon X1300) vs 10.0 (GeForce G 103M). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0c | 10.0+11% |
| Max Displays | 2+100% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1300) vs No (GeForce G 103M). Decoder: Avivo vs PureVideo HD VP3. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (Radeon X1300) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 (GeForce G 103M).
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | No |
| Decoder | Avivo | PureVideo HD VP3 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1300 draws 100W versus the GeForce G 103M's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce G 103M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1300) vs 350W (GeForce G 103M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 30W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | 0mm |
| Height | 69mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 2.1+250% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | GeForce G 103M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GP108 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #336 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1300 and GeForce G 103M
