
Radeon X1300 vs Radeon 2100

Radeon X1300
Popular choices:

Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1300 is positioned at rank 345 and the Radeon 2100 is on rank 725, so the Radeon X1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1300
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 2100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1300.
| Insight | Radeon X1300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $49 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 3.4% better value per dollar than the Radeon X1300.
| Insight | Radeon X1300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1300 and Radeon 2100

Radeon X1300
The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon X1300 scores 58 and the Radeon 2100 reaches 60 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon X1300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon X1300) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 58 | 60+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+267% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+489% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+61% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 88+267% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+1054% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1300 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 has 512 MB. The Radeon 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+1054% | 0.13 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9_0c (Radeon X1300) vs 9.0b (Radeon 2100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9_0c | 9.0b |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Avivo (Radeon X1300) vs Avivo (Radeon 2100). Decoder: Avivo vs Avivo. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 (Radeon X1300) vs MPEG-2 (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Avivo | Avivo |
| Decoder | Avivo | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-4,MPEG-2,DivX,WMV9 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1300 draws 100W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1300) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 1.2+100% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1300 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $49. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon X1300) vs 1.2 (Radeon 2100) — the Radeon 2100 offers 0% better value. The Radeon X1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-33% | $149 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #336 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















