
Radeon X1300
Popular choices:

RADEON X800 PRO
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1300 is positioned at rank 345 and the RADEON X800 PRO is on rank 371, so the Radeon X1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1300
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 PRO
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 PRO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon X1300.
| Insight | Radeon X1300 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-12.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+12.1%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X800 PRO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon X1300, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 266.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1300 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+266.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1300 and RADEON X800 PRO

Radeon X1300
The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

RADEON X800 PRO
The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1300 scores 58 versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 65 — the RADEON X800 PRO leads by 12.1%. The Radeon X1300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON X800 PRO uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon X1300) vs 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300) vs 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2105 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 58 | 65+12% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 3840+173% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS | 16.17 TFLOPS+249% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2105 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 32 | 96+200% |
| TMUs | 88 | 240+173% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) vs 4 MB (RADEON X800 PRO) — the RADEON X800 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1300 draws 100W versus the RADEON X800 PRO's 250W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon X1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1300) vs 350W (RADEON X800 PRO). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-60% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6+100% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1300 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON X800 PRO launched at $399 and now averages $15. The RADEON X800 PRO costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon X1300) vs 4.3 (RADEON X800 PRO) — the RADEON X800 PRO offers 258.3% better value.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON X800 PRO |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-75% | $399 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $15-69% |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2 | 4.3+258% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 21 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #336 | #65 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















