Radeon X1300 vs RADEON E2400
Radeon X1300
Popular choices:
RADEON E2400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon X1300 is positioned at rank 345 and the RADEON E2400 is on rank 351, so the Radeon X1300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1300
Performance Per Dollar RADEON E2400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1300 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon X1300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The RADEON E2400 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 11.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON E2400 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon X1300 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+11.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-11.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon X1300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $49 versus $100 for the RADEON E2400, it costs 51% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 127.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon X1300 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+127.6%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon X1300 and RADEON E2400
Radeon X1300
The Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
RADEON E2400
The RADEON E2400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 52 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon X1300 scores 58 versus the RADEON E2400's 52 — the Radeon X1300 leads by 11.5%. The Radeon X1300 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON E2400 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon X1300) vs 384 (RADEON E2400). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon X1300) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (RADEON E2400). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1124 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 58+12% | 52 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+267% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+410% | 0.9085 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+46% | 1124 MHz |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+267% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon X1300 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON E2400 has 512 MB. The RADEON E2400 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (Radeon X1300) vs 0.5 MB (RADEON E2400) — the Radeon X1300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+200% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon X1300 draws 100W versus the RADEON E2400's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The RADEON E2400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon X1300) vs 350W (RADEON E2400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 50W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 69mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.6 | 1.0+67% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon X1300 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the RADEON E2400 launched at $100 and now averages $100. The Radeon X1300 costs 51% less ($51 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 1.2 (Radeon X1300) vs 0.5 (RADEON E2400) — the Radeon X1300 offers 140% better value. The Radeon X1300 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon X1300 | RADEON E2400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100 | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-51% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 1.2+140% | 0.5 |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Lexa |
| Release | May 28 2020 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #336 | #773 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon X1300 and RADEON E2400
