RADEON X300SE vs Quadro FX 1100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X300SE is positioned at rank #343 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X300SE

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

11514%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

11062%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

10933%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

10914%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

10892%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

10830%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

10694%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10654%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10556%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

10527%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

10400%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

10378%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

10190%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

10184%

#328

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

12698%

#343

RADEON X300SE

MSRP: $60|Avg: $60

100%

#345

Radeon X1300

MSRP: $100|Avg: $49

92%

#346

Radeon X1600 XT

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

92%

#347

RADEON X800 GTO

MSRP: $199|Avg: $199

92%

#348

Radeon X1800 GTO

MSRP: $249|Avg: $20

90%

#349

GeForce 7800 GT

MSRP: $449|Avg: $20

86%

#351

RADEON E2400

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

83%

#352

Radeon X1650 GTO

MSRP: $150|Avg: $20

79%

#353

RADEON X800GT

MSRP: $160|Avg: $10

79%

#354

RADEON X600 SE

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

78%

#355

RADEON X700

MSRP: $149|Avg: $10

78%

#356

Radeon X1900 GT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $20

78%

#357

GeForce G200

MSRP: $299|Avg: $15

71%

#358

RADEON X700 PRO

MSRP: $179|Avg: $30

67%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X300SE is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The RADEON X300SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON X300SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 1100.

Insight	RADEON X300SE	Quadro FX 1100
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+5.6%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.6%)
Longevity	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON X300SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $60 versus $500 for the Quadro FX 1100, it costs 88% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 779.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON X300SE	Quadro FX 1100
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+779.6%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($60)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($500)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X300SE Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 1100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X300SE and Quadro FX 1100

RADEON X300SE

The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.

Quadro FX 1100

The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON X300SE scores 38 versus the Quadro FX 1100's 36 — the RADEON X300SE leads by 5.6%. The RADEON X300SE is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro FX 1100 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (RADEON X300SE) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1100). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100).

Feature	RADEON X300SE	Quadro FX 1100
G3D Mark Score	38+6%	36
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	1408+487%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.632 TFLOPS+645%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	88+10%	80
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X300SE	Quadro FX 1100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X300SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 1100 has 256 MB. The RADEON X300SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1100) — the RADEON X300SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X300SE	Quadro FX 1100
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB+500%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X300SE draws 100W versus the Quadro FX 1100's 189W — a 61.6% difference. The RADEON X300SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X300SE) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON X300SE	Quadro FX 1100
TDP	100W-47%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	190mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	0.4+100%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X300SE launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the Quadro FX 1100 launched at $0 and now averages $500. The RADEON X300SE costs 88% less ($440 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.6 (RADEON X300SE) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1100) — the RADEON X300SE offers 500% better value. The RADEON X300SE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).