RADEON X300SE vs GeForce Go 7200
RADEON X300SE
Popular choices:
GeForce Go 7200
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X300SE is positioned at rank 343 and the GeForce Go 7200 is on rank 307, so the GeForce Go 7200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X300SE
Performance Per Dollar GeForce Go 7200
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X300SE is significantly newer (2020 vs 2014). The RADEON X300SE likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce Go 7200 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce Go 7200 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 18.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the RADEON X300SE offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X300SE | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-18.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+18.4%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+693.7%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce Go 7200 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X300SE and GeForce Go 7200
RADEON X300SE
The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.
GeForce Go 7200
The GeForce Go 7200 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X300SE scores 38 versus the GeForce Go 7200's 45 — the GeForce Go 7200 leads by 18.4%. The RADEON X300SE is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce Go 7200 uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (RADEON X300SE) vs 384 (GeForce Go 7200). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7200).
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38 | 45+18% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+267% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+507% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 88+175% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X300SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce Go 7200 has 65 MB. The RADEON X300SE offers 693.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) vs 0.25 MB (GeForce Go 7200) — the RADEON X300SE has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+694% | 0.063 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB+500% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X300SE draws 100W versus the GeForce Go 7200's 64W — a 43.9% difference. The GeForce Go 7200 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X300SE) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7200). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 64W-36% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.7+75% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X300SE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2014).
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | GeForce Go 7200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | GK107 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #336 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X300SE and GeForce Go 7200
