RADEON X300SE vs Radeon Xpress 1300M
RADEON X300SE
Popular choices:
Radeon Xpress 1300M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X300SE is positioned at rank 343 and the Radeon Xpress 1300M is on rank 363, so the RADEON X300SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X300SE
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Xpress 1300M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.3% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X300SE.
| Insight | RADEON X300SE | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Xpress 1300M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X300SE and Radeon Xpress 1300M
RADEON X300SE
The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.
Radeon Xpress 1300M
The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X300SE scores 38 versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 40 — the Radeon Xpress 1300M leads by 5.3%. The RADEON X300SE is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (RADEON X300SE) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1250 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38 | 40+5% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408+10% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS+45% | 3.2 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+32% | 1250 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 88+10% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X300SE draws 100W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 16.2% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X300SE) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 85W-15% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.5+25% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X300SE is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | Radeon Xpress 1300M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 14 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | November 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #336 | #403 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X300SE and Radeon Xpress 1300M
