
RADEON X300SE vs RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

RADEON X300SE
Popular choices:

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X300SE is positioned at rank #343 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X300SE
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.5% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X300SE.
| Insight | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.5%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 4.0 (2025) (4nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $60 for the RADEON X300SE, it costs 50% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 121.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+121.1%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($30) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X300SE and RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700

RADEON X300SE
The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.

RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700
The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 23 2025. It features the RDNA 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1660 MHz to 2920 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 64 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 42 points. Launch price was $1,299.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X300SE scores 38 versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 42 — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 leads by 10.5%. The RADEON X300SE is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 uses RDNA 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 4 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (RADEON X300SE) vs 4,096 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE) vs 47.84 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2920 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38 | 42+11% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 4.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 4096+191% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS | 47.84 TFLOPS+933% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2920 MHz+78% |
| ROPs | 32 | 128+300% |
| TMUs | 88 | 256+191% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 8 MB+433% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) vs 8 MB (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 8 MB+433% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X300SE draws 100W versus the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700's 300W — a 100% difference. The RADEON X300SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X300SE) vs 350W (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-67% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 175mm |
| Height | — | 100mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+300% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X300SE launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 costs 50% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.6 (RADEON X300SE) vs 1.4 (RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700) — the RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 offers 133.3% better value. The RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9500 PRO / 9700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $30-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6 | 1.4+133% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 48 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | July 23 2025 |
| Ranking | #336 | #23 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















