
RADEON X300SE vs RADEON 9600 XT

RADEON X300SE
Popular choices:

RADEON 9600 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X300SE is positioned at rank 343 and the RADEON 9600 XT is on rank 370, so the RADEON X300SE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X300SE
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9600 XT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X300SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON 9600 XT.
| Insight | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.6%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (5nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON 9600 XT offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $60 for the RADEON X300SE, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 268.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+268.4%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($60) | ✅More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X300SE and RADEON 9600 XT

RADEON X300SE
The RADEON X300SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 28 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1327 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 38 points.

RADEON 9600 XT
The RADEON 9600 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 3 2022. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1387 MHz to 2394 MHz. It has 5376 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 84 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $899.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X300SE scores 38 versus the RADEON 9600 XT's 35 — the RADEON X300SE leads by 8.6%. The RADEON X300SE is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RADEON 9600 XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (RADEON X300SE) vs 5,376 (RADEON 9600 XT). Raw compute: 4.632 TFLOPS (RADEON X300SE) vs 51.48 TFLOPS (RADEON 9600 XT). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2394 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 38+9% | 35 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 5376+282% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.632 TFLOPS | 51.48 TFLOPS+1011% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 2394 MHz+46% |
| ROPs | 32 | 192+500% |
| TMUs | 88 | 336+282% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 6 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X300SE comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9600 XT has 256 MB. The RADEON X300SE offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (RADEON X300SE) vs 6 MB (RADEON 9600 XT) — the RADEON 9600 XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+100% | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 6 MB+300% |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X300SE draws 100W versus the RADEON 9600 XT's 300W — a 100% difference. The RADEON X300SE is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X300SE) vs 350W (RADEON 9600 XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W-67% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+300% | 0.1 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X300SE launched at $60 MSRP and currently averages $60, while the RADEON 9600 XT launched at $199 and now averages $15. The RADEON 9600 XT costs 75% less ($45 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.6 (RADEON X300SE) vs 2.3 (RADEON 9600 XT) — the RADEON 9600 XT offers 283.3% better value. The RADEON 9600 XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2020).
| Feature | RADEON X300SE | RADEON 9600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $60-70% | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $60 | $15-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.6 | 2.3+283% |
| Codename | Navi 14 | Navi 31 |
| Release | May 28 2020 | November 3 2022 |
| Ranking | #336 | #21 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















