CPU
GPU
RADEON X600 PRO
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 550
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X600 PRO is positioned at rank 341 and the Quadro FX 550 is on rank 385, so the RADEON X600 PRO offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X600 PRO
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 550
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON X600 PRO is significantly newer (2020 vs 2008). The RADEON X600 PRO likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X600 PRO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.7% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (512 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro FX 550.
| Insight | RADEON X600 PRO | Quadro FX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X600 PRO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $10 (vs $10), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 4.7% better value per dollar than the Quadro FX 550.
| Insight | RADEON X600 PRO | Quadro FX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+4.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X600 PRO and Quadro FX 550
RADEON X600 PRO
The RADEON X600 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 21 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1130 MHz to 1560 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points.
Quadro FX 550
The Quadro FX 550 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 64 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON X600 PRO scores 67 and the Quadro FX 550 reaches 64 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X600 PRO is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Quadro FX 550 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 240 (Quadro FX 550). Raw compute: 6.39 TFLOPS (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 550).
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | Quadro FX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 67+5% | 64 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+753% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.39 TFLOPS+927% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+60% | 80 |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | Quadro FX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X600 PRO comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 550 has 128 MB. The RADEON X600 PRO offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 550) — the RADEON X600 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | Quadro FX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB+300% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+1100% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X600 PRO draws 150W versus the Quadro FX 550's 189W — a 23% difference. The RADEON X600 PRO is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 350W (Quadro FX 550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | Quadro FX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-21% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 170mm | — |
| Height | 65mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4+33% | 0.3 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X600 PRO launched at $99 MSRP and currently averages $10, while the Quadro FX 550 launched at $150 and now averages $10. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.7 (RADEON X600 PRO) vs 6.4 (Quadro FX 550) — the RADEON X600 PRO offers 4.7% better value. The RADEON X600 PRO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2008).
| Feature | RADEON X600 PRO | Quadro FX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $99-34% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $10 | $10 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.7+5% | 6.4 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GT200B |
| Release | January 21 2020 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #216 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON X600 PRO and Quadro FX 550
