RADEON X800 PRO vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X800 PRO is positioned at rank #371 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 PRO

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

45338%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

43556%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

43050%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

42975%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

42888%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

42644%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

42106%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

41950%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

41563%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

41450%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

40950%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

40862%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

40125%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

40100%

#355

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

50000%

#370

GeForce FX 5200LE

MSRP: $43|Avg: $25

100%

#371

RADEON X800 PRO

MSRP: $399|Avg: $15

100%

#372

GeForce FX 5200SE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

75%

#373

GeForce FX 5200

MSRP: $70|Avg: $25

69%

#374

RADEON 9800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $30

69%

#375

GeForce PCX 5300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

63%

#376

GeForce FX 5900

MSRP: $399|Avg: $20

56%

#377

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

56%

#378

GeForce FX 5100

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

50%

#379

GeForce FX 5600XT

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

44%

#380

GeForce FX 5600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $10

44%

#381

GeForce4 Ti 4200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $5

19%

#382

GeForce3 Ti 200

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

19%

#383

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

13%

#384

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

13%

#385

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

13%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 12006.2% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (4 GB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 PRO.

Insight	RADEON X800 PRO	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-12006.2%)	✅Leading raw performance (+12006.2%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+1500%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 1650 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $75 (vs $15), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 2321.2% better value per dollar than the RADEON X800 PRO.

Insight	RADEON X800 PRO	GeForce GTX 1650
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+2321.2%)
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($15)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($75)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X800 PRO Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 PRO and GeForce GTX 1650

RADEON X800 PRO

The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON X800 PRO scores 65 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 12006.2%. The RADEON X800 PRO is built on RDNA 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1650 uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 896 (GeForce GTX 1650). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 2.984 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1650). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

Feature	RADEON X800 PRO	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	65	7,869+12006%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	Turing
Process Node	7 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	3840+329%	896
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.17 TFLOPS+442%	2.984 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2105 MHz+26%	1665 MHz
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	240+329%	56
L1 Cache	768 KB	896 KB+17%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X800 PRO	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X800 PRO comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 1 MB (GeForce GTX 1650) — the RADEON X800 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X800 PRO	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	4 GB+1500%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB+300%	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X800 PRO draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GTX 1650 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Legacy vs None.

Feature	RADEON X800 PRO	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	250W	75W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	300W-14%
Power Connector	Legacy	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	0.3	104.9+34867%

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X800 PRO launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The RADEON X800 PRO costs 80% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.3 (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the GeForce GTX 1650 offers 2339.5% better value. The RADEON X800 PRO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).