
RADEON X800 PRO vs Radeon 2100

RADEON X800 PRO
Popular choices:

Radeon 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON X800 PRO is positioned at rank 371 and the Radeon 2100 is on rank 725, so the RADEON X800 PRO offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 PRO
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON X800 PRO is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 8.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON X800 PRO | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+8.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-8.3%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The RADEON X800 PRO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon 2100, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 253.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RADEON X800 PRO | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+253.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 PRO and Radeon 2100

RADEON X800 PRO
The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON X800 PRO scores 65 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the RADEON X800 PRO leads by 8.3%. The RADEON X800 PRO is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 1024 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 65+8% | 60 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+900% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.17 TFLOPS+1956% | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2105 MHz+106% | 1024 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+1100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 240+900% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 768 KB+700% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+2977% | 0.13 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON X800 PRO comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 has 512 MB. The Radeon 2100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon 2100) — the RADEON X800 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+2977% | 0.13 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON X800 PRO draws 250W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 50W-80% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.3 | 1.2+300% |
Value Analysis
The RADEON X800 PRO launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $49. The RADEON X800 PRO costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.3 (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 1.2 (Radeon 2100) — the RADEON X800 PRO offers 258.3% better value. The RADEON X800 PRO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | RADEON X800 PRO | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $149-63% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.3+258% | 1.2 |
| Codename | Navi 21 | Polaris 24 |
| Release | October 28 2020 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #65 | #898 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















