RADEON X800 PRO vs Radeon X1550

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON X800 PRO is positioned at rank #371 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON X800 PRO

#1

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

MSRP: $399|Avg: $280

45338%

#2

GeForce RTX 5060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

43556%

#3

Radeon RX 5600 XT

MSRP: $279|Avg: $180

43050%

#4

Radeon RX 9060

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

42975%

#5

GeForce RTX 5050

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

42888%

#6

GeForce RTX 3050 OEM

MSRP: $249|Avg: $150

42644%

#7

Arc A580

MSRP: $179|Avg: $179

42106%

#8

Radeon RX 9060 XT

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

41950%

#9

Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

41563%

#10

Radeon RX 7600

MSRP: $269|Avg: $250

41450%

#11

Radeon RX 6600

MSRP: $329|Avg: $180

40950%

#12

GeForce RTX 4060

MSRP: $299|Avg: $299

40862%

#13

Arc B570

MSRP: $219|Avg: $219

40125%

#14

Arc B580

MSRP: $249|Avg: $249

40100%

#355

Radeon R5 430 OEM

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13

50000%

#370

GeForce FX 5200LE

MSRP: $43|Avg: $25

100%

#371

RADEON X800 PRO

MSRP: $399|Avg: $15

100%

#372

GeForce FX 5200SE

MSRP: $99|Avg: $10

75%

#373

GeForce FX 5200

MSRP: $70|Avg: $25

69%

#374

RADEON 9800 XT

MSRP: $499|Avg: $30

69%

#375

GeForce PCX 5300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $15

63%

#376

GeForce FX 5900

MSRP: $399|Avg: $20

56%

#377

GeForce FX 5600 Ultra

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

56%

#378

GeForce FX 5100

MSRP: $100|Avg: $10

50%

#379

GeForce FX 5600XT

MSRP: $129|Avg: $10

44%

#380

GeForce FX 5600

MSRP: $200|Avg: $10

44%

#381

GeForce4 Ti 4200

MSRP: $199|Avg: $5

19%

#382

GeForce3 Ti 200

MSRP: $149|Avg: $49

19%

#383

GeForce4 MX 460

MSRP: $179|Avg: $15

13%

#384

GeForce4 Ti 4400

MSRP: $299|Avg: $49

13%

#385

GeForce4 Ti 4800 SE

MSRP: $299|Avg: $30

13%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON X800 PRO uses modern memory architecture. The RADEON X800 PRO likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon X1550 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1550 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RADEON X800 PRO.

Insight	RADEON X800 PRO	Radeon X1550
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+3.1%)
Longevity	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The RADEON X800 PRO offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon X1550, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 216.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	RADEON X800 PRO	Radeon X1550
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+216.9%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($15)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

RADEON X800 PRO Benchmark Check

Radeon X1550 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON X800 PRO and Radeon X1550

RADEON X800 PRO

The RADEON X800 PRO is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2105 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 65 points. Launch price was $579.

Radeon X1550

The Radeon X1550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 67 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The RADEON X800 PRO scores 65 and the Radeon X1550 reaches 67 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON X800 PRO is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon X1550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 512 (Radeon X1550). Raw compute: 16.17 TFLOPS (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1550). Boost clocks: 2105 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

Feature	RADEON X800 PRO	Radeon X1550
G3D Mark Score	65	67+3%
Architecture	RDNA 2.0	GCN 4.0
Process Node	7 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	3840+650%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	16.17 TFLOPS+1235%	1.211 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	2105 MHz+78%	1183 MHz
ROPs	96+500%	16
TMUs	240+650%	32
L1 Cache	768 KB+500%	128 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	RADEON X800 PRO	Radeon X1550
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON X800 PRO comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1550 has 512 MB. The Radeon X1550 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon X1550) — the RADEON X800 PRO has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	RADEON X800 PRO	Radeon X1550
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+1500%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON X800 PRO draws 250W versus the Radeon X1550's 50W — a 133.3% difference. The Radeon X1550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 350W (Radeon X1550). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	RADEON X800 PRO	Radeon X1550
TDP	250W	50W-80%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Slots	—	1
Perf/Watt	0.3	1.3+333%

💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON X800 PRO launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon X1550 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The RADEON X800 PRO costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.3 (RADEON X800 PRO) vs 1.4 (Radeon X1550) — the RADEON X800 PRO offers 207.1% better value. The RADEON X800 PRO is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2017).